Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comparison of fad remakes"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) [[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT) | To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) [[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I strongly agree with you. This is the #1 article where self-promoting bottom-feeders feed off of the most with their lame {{**}} sites. In addition, many sites in this list have been deleted or killed. There needs to be a rule on this article about the site having a certain amount of views and/or a good rating. -Bruno | ||
Revision as of 19:04, September 28, 2006
The List of PTKFGS variations has a list of many alternate universe fads, but only on PTKFGS. This article, isn't that long, but it covers YesYes and fourth universe, too. And the PTKFGS list is WAY too messy. --It's Smiddle, LOL. 17:09, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
- They should all be merged into the fad remakes page (this one). kthxbi -Mysekurity | O RLY? 18:40, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
- k --It's Smiddle, LOL. 06:36, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
Cleanup
Could PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZ someone more than me try to clean this shit up!? kthxbi --It's Smiddle, LOL | I believe you have my Talk Page? 15:04, June 11, 2006 (CDT)
GAYTMND?
Should GAYTMND be added to this? It does have some fad remakes. -Bruno
- GAYTMND isn't really a alternate universe so says MasterSitsu. -HallwayGiant 19:34, August 10, 2006 (CDT)
- I know. But lots of people make fad remakes.
Featured Article?
this is probably the most poorly kept site on the wiki. about half the list is trash posted by their creators. are there any requirements (votes/views/ratings) to get on this list? --Dyskrasia 14:34, August 13, 2006 (CDT)
To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) Gerkuman 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT)
I strongly agree with you. This is the #1 article where self-promoting bottom-feeders feed off of the most with their lame 
sites. In addition, many sites in this list have been deleted or killed. There needs to be a rule on this article about the site having a certain amount of views and/or a good rating. -Bruno
