Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comparison of fad remakes"

Revision as of 10:29, November 27, 2006

The List of PTKFGS variations has a list of many alternate universe fads, but only on PTKFGS. This article, isn't that long, but it covers YesYes and fourth universe, too. And the PTKFGS list is WAY too messy. --It's Smiddle, LOL. 17:09, 4 June 2006 (CDT)

They should all be merged into the fad remakes page (this one). kthxbi -Mysekurity | O RLY? 18:40, 4 June 2006 (CDT)

k --It's Smiddle, LOL. 06:36, 5 June 2006 (CDT)

GAYTMND?

Should GAYTMND be added to this? It does have some fad remakes. -Bruno

GAYTMND isn't really a alternate universe so says MasterSitsu. -HallwayGiant 19:34, August 10, 2006 (CDT)

I know. But lots of people make fad remakes.

Featured Article?

this is probably the most poorly kept site on the wiki. about half the list is trash posted by their creators. are there any requirements (votes/views/ratings) to get on this list? --Dyskrasia 14:34, August 13, 2006 (CDT)

To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) Gerkuman 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT)

Cleanup

This article is a serious mess. Many sites that are linked in this article have been killed or deleted. And there are many poorly made sites here that were posted by their creators who think that just because they made some PTKFGS, YESYES, YHTMOAG, HEH, etc. fad remake, they can post it on this article. That is a violation of Wiki Rule #4. There should be some rule in this article that if you are going to post a site, it should have a good rating and/or view count. To summarize: we need to remove those deleted, killed, and self sponsored (wiki sponsored) sites. -Bruno

Who is that in "ha,internet"?-An Eskimo

Other Remakes

Are there any other notable fad remakes not listed? For example, a remake of the WoW is serious buisness fad.

I'll look into it, I made a PTKFGS version of WoW is serious, but I doubt it's notable.--tomglima 10:29, November 27, 2006 (CST)