Difference between revisions of "User talk:Westing1992"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
(I don't even care)
(umfuld vandalism)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
[[User:Westing1992/openletters]]<BR/>
 
[[User:Westing1992/openletters]]<BR/>
 
[[User_talk:Westing1992/Archive1]]
 
[[User_talk:Westing1992/Archive1]]
 +
 +
 +
I made an entry for [[User:UmfuId]] in [[User-related_fads]] and [[User:UmfuId]] may try to have it removed. It's a perfectly legitimate entry. The content is neutral and the information is correct. You can search for "umfuld" yourself and see there are hundreds of sites made about him. He is clearly a fad. If he doesn't want his name to appear in the wiki, that's too bad. There are rules and they must be followed. [[User:Nothingman|Nothingman]] 07:04, August 19, 2011 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:04, August 19, 2011

I'm not sure where to post this, so I hope this is the right place. Can you please ban Anig? He has been deleting articles repeatedly. The NEDM inspectors were all banned for deleting 1 article each, so surely Anig is deserving of a ban.

So Anig is allowed to vandalize the wiki? He vandalized several long-standing articles multiple times! What does it take? I feel like he's being given special treatment because of who he chose as his victim. This is cyber-bullying. Will you at least agree to ban him for good if he does it again? Nothingman 12:27, August 1, 2011 (CDT)

User:Westing1992/openletters
User_talk:Westing1992/Archive1


I made an entry for User:UmfuId in User-related_fads and User:UmfuId may try to have it removed. It's a perfectly legitimate entry. The content is neutral and the information is correct. You can search for "umfuld" yourself and see there are hundreds of sites made about him. He is clearly a fad. If he doesn't want his name to appear in the wiki, that's too bad. There are rules and they must be followed. Nothingman 07:04, August 19, 2011 (CDT)