Difference between revisions of "User talk:Maplejet"
From YTMND
(Dude!!) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Dude, why not [[Awesome God]]? Is there a rule against articles on the songs? I know I seen it in more than just the Jesus fads!! //// Pacific PanDeist 14:30, October 5, 2006 (CDT) | Dude, why not [[Awesome God]]? Is there a rule against articles on the songs? I know I seen it in more than just the Jesus fads!! //// Pacific PanDeist 14:30, October 5, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You'll have to take a look at it yourself. Use the talk page for the site. Most of the info for Awesome God is already listed in Jesus itself, making it quite useless. Others like that Secret Nazi fad have been involved in other fads as subject of misinterpretation. Daft Punk has their own page because numerous songs by them have been fadded to death. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 17:32, October 5, 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:32, October 5, 2006
Dude, why not Awesome God? Is there a rule against articles on the songs? I know I seen it in more than just the Jesus fads!! //// Pacific PanDeist 14:30, October 5, 2006 (CDT)
- You'll have to take a look at it yourself. Use the talk page for the site. Most of the info for Awesome God is already listed in Jesus itself, making it quite useless. Others like that Secret Nazi fad have been involved in other fads as subject of misinterpretation. Daft Punk has their own page because numerous songs by them have been fadded to death. Maplejet 17:32, October 5, 2006 (CDT)
