Difference between revisions of "Talk:Advanced YTMND Theory"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I did unoriginality and all I got was top 5. That's weird enough... maybe there's more Nintendudes than the rest. <small>–[[User:Smiddle|It's Smiddle, LOL]] · [[User talk:Smiddle/userpage|What is Talk Page?]] · [[Special:Contributions/Smiddle|KHAAANTRIBUTIONS!]]</small> 10:50, October 10, 2006 (CDT) | I did unoriginality and all I got was top 5. That's weird enough... maybe there's more Nintendudes than the rest. <small>–[[User:Smiddle|It's Smiddle, LOL]] · [[User talk:Smiddle/userpage|What is Talk Page?]] · [[Special:Contributions/Smiddle|KHAAANTRIBUTIONS!]]</small> 10:50, October 10, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm glad I discovered this article. I've been thinking about theories myself and trying to deduce how ratings come out the way they are. I ended up believing that the idea of the ytmnd far outweighs how much effort/skill there was in the image/sound edits. I also reasoned that something serious mixed with something funny makes up the best ytmnd idea. Look at the top rated sites, most of them have that. There are PCF/Sylvester's sites that find humor in war movies, Improviser found humor in the news, and so forth. You may be thinking that these ideas are obvious. Well, of course they are, and that's partly what makes them great. They're shockingly simple. [[User:Ochobobo|Ochobobo]] 21:44, February 26, 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:44, February 26, 2007
Good idea for starting the article! However, too bad that I can't help...--Artman40 07:34, September 27, 2006 (CDT)
I'm also interested in seeing what will go here Whetstone 09:05, September 27, 2006 (CDT)
This might be a good way of fighting off some NARVism, but we'll have to find ways for them to see it. Maplejet 05:59, September 28, 2006 (CDT)
I did unoriginality and all I got was top 5. That's weird enough... maybe there's more Nintendudes than the rest. –It's Smiddle, LOL · What is Talk Page? · KHAAANTRIBUTIONS! 10:50, October 10, 2006 (CDT)
I'm glad I discovered this article. I've been thinking about theories myself and trying to deduce how ratings come out the way they are. I ended up believing that the idea of the ytmnd far outweighs how much effort/skill there was in the image/sound edits. I also reasoned that something serious mixed with something funny makes up the best ytmnd idea. Look at the top rated sites, most of them have that. There are PCF/Sylvester's sites that find humor in war movies, Improviser found humor in the news, and so forth. You may be thinking that these ideas are obvious. Well, of course they are, and that's partly what makes them great. They're shockingly simple. Ochobobo 21:44, February 26, 2007 (CST)
