Difference between revisions of "User talk:Click/Life on Mars"
m (Talk:Life on Mars moved to User talk:Click/Life on Mars: user related) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
yeah, Click, love the series, but drwav, this page should like be a sub-heading under Click's own wiki since it involves only Click. [[User:kepledon|kepledon]] 11:19, September 17, 2007 (MST) | yeah, Click, love the series, but drwav, this page should like be a sub-heading under Click's own wiki since it involves only Click. [[User:kepledon|kepledon]] 11:19, September 17, 2007 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I realize that "crudely drawn" could be interperted as a negative comment, but I was purely trying to describe the content contained in the YTMND, if you can think of a better adjactive please update the wiki article with it. I realzie that a great deal of effort was put into the details of the console in part 6, but I needed to describe the drawing style somehow and it is quite crude by modern standards. BTape, what "shit talk" are you refering to? The only item that could be considered that is the description as "crudely drawn" and I have already explained that above. [[User:Drwav|Drwav]] 17:45, September 17, 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:45, September 17, 2007
'crudely drawn' !??!??!?! PSSSHHHHH. whatev -dctownes
this wiki is full of shit talk and is a violation of some lame policy im about to make up BTape 00:01, September 17, 2007 (CDT)
yeah, Click, love the series, but drwav, this page should like be a sub-heading under Click's own wiki since it involves only Click. kepledon 11:19, September 17, 2007 (MST)
I realize that "crudely drawn" could be interperted as a negative comment, but I was purely trying to describe the content contained in the YTMND, if you can think of a better adjactive please update the wiki article with it. I realzie that a great deal of effort was put into the details of the console in part 6, but I needed to describe the drawing style somehow and it is quite crude by modern standards. BTape, what "shit talk" are you refering to? The only item that could be considered that is the description as "crudely drawn" and I have already explained that above. Drwav 17:45, September 17, 2007 (CDT)
