Difference between revisions of "Talk:YTMND Soundtrack"
From YTMND
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I really dont think we need the examples/fads table. Some of the songs are used in more than one fad, and it'll just get messy. I think the history of the soundtrack and it's tracklisting is sufficient enough. We can add what music is used for each fad on it's own fad page (add it to the template.) Suggestions? [[User:Fyrestorm|-- fyrestorm]] 11:42, June 14, 2006 (CDT) | I really dont think we need the examples/fads table. Some of the songs are used in more than one fad, and it'll just get messy. I think the history of the soundtrack and it's tracklisting is sufficient enough. We can add what music is used for each fad on it's own fad page (add it to the template.) Suggestions? [[User:Fyrestorm|-- fyrestorm]] 11:42, June 14, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::But I would like to know which song goes with which fad, not the other way around. Some songs are used more than once, but I think songs used on only one site are also important. [[User:Woman71|--woMan71]] 8:47, 15 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:46, June 15, 2006
Article Layout
I'm not digging the tables. -- fyrestorm 00:19, 29 May 2006 (CDT)
- Por que? I think they look much better, but what's your beef? -Mysekurity | O RLY? 00:20, 29 May 2006 (CDT)
- Looks really ugly. Dunno, maybe if someone cleans it up/updates it. -- fyrestorm 04:08, 29 May 2006 (CDT)
- If they were at least all the same width, it might look better. --Puphles 21:23, June 11, 2006 (CDT)
I really dont think we need the examples/fads table. Some of the songs are used in more than one fad, and it'll just get messy. I think the history of the soundtrack and it's tracklisting is sufficient enough. We can add what music is used for each fad on it's own fad page (add it to the template.) Suggestions? -- fyrestorm 11:42, June 14, 2006 (CDT)
- But I would like to know which song goes with which fad, not the other way around. Some songs are used more than once, but I think songs used on only one site are also important. --woMan71 8:47, 15 June 2006 (CDT)
